Part One
2013.04.14.Oyster (sunlight) f/9 1/640 ISO-100 |
2013.04.14.Oyster (shade) f/9 1/100 ISO-100 |
2013.04.20.Oyster (low sun) f/5 1/125 ISO-100 |
Part 2
2013.04.14.Rock (shade-autoWB).jpg f/9 1/50 ISO-100 |
2013.04.14.Rock (shade-daylightWB).jpg f/9 1/50 ISO-100 |
2013.04.14.Rock (shade-shadeWB) f/9 1/50 ISO-100 |
Of the above three images taken in the shade, the auto white balance is least appealing to me. The shade white balance setting gives the warmest image, and daylight fairly neutral. With the backrground fairly neutral as well, the last image works best for me, as the subject is more distinguishable from the background
2013.04.14.Rock (sun-autoWB).jpg f/9 1/800 ISO-100 |
2013.04.14.Rock (sun-daylightWB).jpg f/9 1/640 ISO-100 |
2013.04.14.Rock (sun-shadeWB).jpg f/9 1/640 ISO-100 |
With the WB set to shade, the above image in full sunlight was warmer than with the daylight and auto settings. This does really make sense, as the daylight and auto settings compensate and tone down the warmth, while the shade setting does the opposite. I liked this image more than the other two, although with WB set to daylight the image is a truer representation of the actual subject. In some circumstances this may be more desirable.
2013.04.20.Rock (lowsun-autoWB) f/4.5 1/100 ISO-100 |
2013.04.20.Rock (lowsun-daylightWB) f/4.5 1/100 1/100 |
2013.04.20.Rock (lowsun-shadeWB) f/4.5 1/100 1/100 |
The above three images with the sun low follow the same pattern as the other two sets, although there is not much between the auto and daylight white balance settings. The shade WB setting is the warmest again. I like the last image, although it is perhaps unnaturally orange, and I think the first image with auto white balance is the most balanced of the three photos. Clearly it may be desirable to tone down the colour temperature for other subjects and scenes, so I would not always choose to add warmth through white balance variation.
No comments:
Post a Comment